|
Sometimes
that's all that's needed to take full advantage of an opportunity
or to solve a temporary problem. We can help with that. We
are experienced at finding and structuring the best financing
even in such challenging situations as replacing defaulted
loans.
But,
a decision to borrow or to sell equity may not be the best
solution even if it's possible. There are always consequences
to obtaining funding: additional costs are incurred for interest
or other loan charges, or ownership in the company is given
up at some valuation in exchange for cash, or even just for
loan guarantees. Clearly it's better to avoid all of those
if the company's objectives can be met without them. And there
are circumstances where additional funding is just a patch
that covers up an undiscovered serious problem.
Some
of our best work has been in showing clients
how to meet their objectives without additional borrowing
or selling equity in their company.
How
do we tell the difference?
If there appears to be a cash shortage or other capital need,
our approach has four parts:
- Analyze
the company's financial situation (see "Condition
Assessment") to be certain that there really is
a need and why it exists
- Determine
whether additional capital is the best way to solve the
problem or take advantage of an opportunity, or if some
other solution is better
- If
additional capital is determined to be the best choice,
develop a cash plan to demonstrate the need, and to prove
the ability for loan payback or return on investment
- Properly
implement the decision
Case
Studies
Sometimes
management decides on a course of action that does not address
the real problem. Below are some real-life examples
of how symptoms can be confused with causes and our ability
to discover the difference.
- A
company's management thought all they needed was more financing.
With declining sales and increasing losses, that wasn't
possible. And it wouldn't have solved the problem anyway.
We cut a computer reseller's break-even point by 40%;
despite temporarily decreased sales, and the bottom line
improved from loss of 5% of sales to a profit of 10%. Click
here to learn more
- Management
engaged us to return the company to profitability and
to evaluate a proposed loan from a banker met at a cocktail
party. We analyzed the proposal, found that the "loan"
was a cleverly disguised takeover attempt and exposed it.
Then we lowered the growing call center's overhead by 30%
while increasing overall productivity; profits improved
by 50%. No loan was necessary. Click
here to learn more
- Sometimes
owners look at the imminent demise of their company and
think it's just a temporary problem. For this company, we
removed the critical threats, developed valuable management
tools, and eliminated the need for expensive additional
financing. Click here to learn more

Choose
a Service:
|
|